On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 01:05:57PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Only four reverse-deps in the archive that have strict versioned deps on an > upstream version of eglibc due to private symbols: libnss-db, dante, libnih, > unscd. All leaf packages, currently up-to-date in testing, no entanglements > with other current transitions. Other packages may pick up versioned deps > on libc 2.13 when uploaded and block other transitions temporarily while > eglibc clears, but no two-way entanglement and eglibc 2.13 seems to have > been rather thoroughly tested in experimental already so there's reason to > believe the transition will be quick. > > Ack from me, please go ahead. >
Thanks for the ack. Even if I think eglibc has been correctly tested, I still expect a few bugs appearing when more people test the package. I won't be able to do any real debugging from next Wednesday to Monday 25th (even if I will be online from time to time), so I am planning to do the upload around the 24th-25th. Of course if someone volunteer to take care of the bugs during that period, I can upload it earlier. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
