On Sat, 03 Sep 2005, Micah Anderson wrote: > If these requirements are too much, and make it not worth you having me > sponsor the package, I'd probably prefer to just be the maintainer myself, > but would be very happy to have your contributions/improvements and act as > co-maintainers!
I dont think I was very clear here, basically the options are: 1. One of you be the package maintainer. Because there can only be one maintainer it would either have to be one of you, or we setup an alioth project, with a mailing list and that mailing list is the package maintainer. We setup a svn repository for the package so everyone can access it and make changes that all can share. 2. I be the primary maintainer and you can co-maintain it. This would mean that you would subscribe to the package so you would get bug reports, you can respond to bug reports, and improve the package, and I participate in that process and do the uploads. We would have a svn repository for this scenario as well. So, the way I see it is if there is one of you who really wants to be the rkhunter maintainer, and is looking for a package to maintain actively with debian (perhaps for the purpose of being a stepping stone to becoming a debian maintainer, as having a package in the archive is a necessary step), then speak up and say you will be that person and that the requirements for sponsorship I detailed previously are acceptable. Or, if you just want to help we can do a co-maintainership. I'm fine with managing the package, but I want to give you guys the opportunity to be the package maintainer if you want (especially since you have done some good work on it already!). micah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]