On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > I know that this is an inconvenience for you but I don't believe that > > keeping an un-actionable bug open can relieve your problems with this > > particular issue. > > Thanks for the honest answer. What I am searching for is any reasonable > reason _why_ this patch was dropped from debian package and _why_ not to > put it back again. There are so many patches in debian mutt that might > have no change to get included in upstream. So why not this particular > patch? More over as it fix a buggy behaviour.
Hi Klaus, thanks for your mail; just off the top of my mind I wasn't aware of the patch, I started contributing to the mutt package in Jan 2009, if you have any reference to the patch please let me know and I will try to see if we had any reasons for dropping it. Cheers Antonio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
