On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:53:42 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > On 15 April 2011 at 13:27, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > | Can we get this into Debian as well? > > Yes please!
cool! > | Can kst2 just take over the kst > | name, seeing as there's not currently a kst package? > > Maybe but http://kst-plot.kde.org/ makes it clear that 'kst1' and 'kst2' are > not feature-by-feature substitutes. I would say that if we don't ever intend to support kst 1.0 again, then there is no longer any need to make a distinction in the name. kst 2.0 would just be *the* kst package. We certainly don't need to support feature-by-feature compliance if we don't ever intend to support the older version. jamie.
pgpQWByu84Aj8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
