Hi, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The change is very old, not many users will be affected by this. > > Guillem, what do you think? Should we silence the warning due to this? I am not Guillem :) but I think the ideal thing would be a way for the user to (perhaps explicitly) update the status db by inserting an architecture. Available seems less of a problem given the workaround "dpkg --clear-avail"; in an ideal world "apt-get update" and "dselect update" would be taught[1] to remove stale entries, though. Especially for the sake of cross-upgrade support, the architecture field seems kind of important. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/478970 and especially http://bugs.debian.org/551638 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
