On Apr 06, Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> wrote: > /run has been added to base-files today (6.2). initscripts will > mount a tmpfs there shortly (#620191), but for the moment it's > just an empty directory. Looks like this one is the real bug: systems should not have a /run unless it will actually be available as such. Why should base-files not depend on the newer initscripts? Other programs could behave like udev does.
> use /run if a tmpfs is also mounted there. The way to do > that is to depend upon initscripts (>= xxx) once it's uploaded. Is a dependency even enough to handle upgrades, or would it need to be a pre-depends? -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
