On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:47:31PM +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > Every thing looks correct on your system. > > Can you please send me the output of "aptitude show binutils"?
[~]# dpkg -l 'binutils*' Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-=========================-=========================-================================================================== ii binutils 2.21.0.20110327-2 The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities un binutils-doc <none> (no description available) ii binutils-gold 2.21.0.20110327-2 The (experimental) GNU gold linker utility un binutils-multiarch <none> (no description available) > I suspect you are using binutils-gold, didn't you? Indeed. And this was the problem, with the traditional linker executables compiled with fpc work again. -- 1KB // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor: // Never attribute to stupidity what can be // adequately explained by malice. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org