On ven., 2011-04-01 at 21:29 +0200, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: > (gdb) bt > #0 0xb6e51a57 in g_str_hash () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #1 0xb6e1f922 in ?? () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #2 0xb7da294b in camel_folder_summary_migrate_infos () from > /usr/lib/libcamel-provider-1.2.so.14 > #3 0xb5dd19f4 in migrate_folders (store=0x80b89a0, is_local=1, fi=0x8659250, > acc=0xb63ec2b9 "Sur cet ordinateur", ex=0xbffff26c, done=0xbffff27c, > nth_folder=0xb3334288, total_folders=27) at e-mail-migrate.c:2847 > #4 0xb5dd1a33 in migrate_folders (store=0x80b89a0, is_local=1, fi=0x86590c8, > acc=0xb63ec2b9 "Sur cet ordinateur", ex=0xbffff26c, done=0xbffff27c, > nth_folder=0xb3334288, total_folders=27) at e-mail-migrate.c:2848 > #5 0xb5dd1bfd in migrate_folders_to_db_thread (migrate_dbs=0xbffff268) at > e-mail-migrate.c:2906 > #6 0xb6e586cf in ?? () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #7 0xb77fb955 in start_thread () from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 > #8 0xb6d78e7e in clone () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
Hmhm, weird, never see something like that. Could you retry with debugging symbols from glib and do a bt full? Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
