On Friday 01 April 2011 22:02:24 Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
I agree that the possibly optimal resolution would be to inhibit the install of "timelimit(1)" as part of "netpipes". Do grant me some time to evaluate both executables before I make my decision final and public.
Of course, have your time. Also, we can take into account that no package currently in debian archive, depends or recommends or suggests netpipes, OHOT chrony package depends on timelimit package. Renaming or fading away timelimit from netpipes package, might break some local user scripts which rely on timelimit program provided by netpipes, but they seem to be broken already anyway, as this very bug report demonstrates it.
You have my appreciation for directing me to this calamity.
Yeah, I'd like to see this situation improved. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
