On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Gerrit Pape wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 02:34:16PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > 34215 > > > > With 4 people ranking 3 first, and Steve ranking it second, I believe > > the outcome is no longer in doubt, and so the CTTE has resolved that > > > > 3. Qmail is to be allowed in to the archive after a patch to resolve > > the delayed bounces issue, where mail sent to an invalid recipient > > which a reasonable MTA is capable of knowing is invalid is accepted > > instead of being rejected at RCPT TO time. After upload, the process > > outlined in option #2 will take effect. > > > > [From option #2] > > > > Ftpmaster should perform standard NEW processing for licensing, > > copyright, and general packaging issues as normal. with the addition > > of an RC bug filed immediately to preventing normal transition for a > > period of at least a month after traversing NEW. > > Hi, packages are in NEW since more than one year without any comments > from ftpmasters. I don't think that's "standard NEW processing for > licensing, copyright, and general packaging issues as normal", isn't it?
Has the patch to fix the delayed bounces issue been applied? Don Armstrong -- Cheop's Law: Nothing ever gets built on schedule or within budget. -- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p242 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
