On 23.03.2011 17:38, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 05:16:48PM +0100, Vladimir '??-coder/phcoder' > Serbinenko wrote: > >> On 08.02.2011 23:08, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: >> >>> the new 1.99~rc1-2 fails to install to my /dev/md0. 1.98+20100804-14 did >>> well. >>> >> It's >> grub-install /dev/sda >> and >> grub-install /dev/sdb >> > Yes, but 1.98+20100804 did this automatically with > grub-install /dev/md0 > while 1.99~rc1 doesn't appear to do it anymore. > Hence, I'd classify this a regression. > > grub-install /dev/md0 would refer to writing of the first sector of md0, not of the hosting disk. This makes sense in context of virtual machines (e.g. kvm /dev/md0). If it did anything else I'd classify it as a bug. > Furthermore, I believe grub-install /dev/md0 should be the preferred way > because it searches the correct drives themselves and is hence robust > against changing device names, changing disks, etc. > This would inscribe into another feature request of installing to a device containing given partition. IT's not yet clear which interface this will use. > > regards > Mario >
-- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
