Package: mutt Version: 1.5.20-9+squeeze1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole
The gnutls implementation of ssl found in mutt, in mutt_ssl_gnutls.c, appears to not validate the common name of a remote server correctly. The openssl implementation found in mutt_ssl.c does perform this check correctly. Can the mutt package be re-build against openssl and not gnutls. This bug is reported upstream at http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3506. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38 (SMP w/128 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
