Hi, On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:50:38PM +0200, alex bodnaru wrote: > first, it has presumably to do with nfs. we should probably rework the lock > supressing on nfs based files. > > but maybe not: the deb distributed upstream seems to work fine, however lsof > shows nfs based locks. so locks are being handled despite our work to avoid > it. > > the deb made by you works fine, but only when nfs is not involved.
Aha. Why didn't you tell this in those months? I mean, root fs parts or $HOME on nfs is not *that* common anymore nowdays.. Of course noone ever will try on that unless specifically told. > further, i have replaced soffice.bin installed by your deb, with the one > distributed upstream, and now my problem dissapears. > there was one difference so far between the files opened with an empty writer > window: /usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/libucpchelp1.so is being open by > the upstream binary only. > > could you have a look at any possible reasons for this difference? Probably. libreoffice-build (formerly known as ooo-build) has some patches there. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 P.S: And you should finally go and follow netiquette and learn to quote properly and not top-post: http://learn.to/quote. Read it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
