> > Fossil ships with its own copy of sqlite, which I remove in favour of
> > the debian package. For a while I used an aggressive version
> > dependency, but I recently switched to guarding the snippets of code
> > in the fossil sources that use advanced sqlite functionality. (Which
> > is used in all cases for extra safety or metering, and not essential
> > functionality.)
> Have you sent this patch upstream?
No.
The involved patches are really not very long. If upstream wants to
support this, they could probably write the appropriate code faster
than they could vet mine.
However upstream ships with a copy of the sqlite3 sources, so I'd
imagine they see no need for supporting any version of sqlite3 other
than what they're shipping. In fact, as it happens the fossil
upstream developer is also the upstream developer of sqlite3, so
fossil often contains has experimental versions of sqlite3.
--Barak.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
