On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 12:16 +0100, Volker Behr wrote: > > Comparing the logs for the two installations of 2.5.1 it seems the files > printed in either case are not identical and/or not printed the same > way, so it is hard to discern what differences in the log are due to > what differences in the setup (e.g., in one case, there is a PS title > found, in the other it is not). > > It would be good to have the log for one empty PDF and one good PDF > using 2.5.1 (and, of course, identical versions of CUPS and GhostScipt - > chack that in any case!), both using identical cups-pdf.conf-settings, > identical PPDs, identical printing commands and identical input files. > > Regards, > Volker >
Hi Volker, I'm pretty sure that I've printed the same web page: www.cups-pdf.de The web page's title is CUPS-PDF. All three logs are printed from iceweasel. -- Bin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
