Hi Andrew,

I am currently looking into a problem with the k3b dependencies and I was
wondering if you would have any objections to changing the priority of
cdrdao from "extra" to "optional".

The main reason for this is to allow front-ends which have a priority of
"optional" to depend on cdrdao.  Such packages currently include "burn",
"gnomebaker" and "k3b".  In the case of k3b for example, the lack of cdrdao
reduces the fonctionalities of the program so much that many users feel k3b
should depend on it, however Debian Policy [1] prevents packages from depending
on packages with a lower priority.

Thanks,

Francois

[1] See the last paragraph of Section 2.5:
    http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to