reassign 505438 libdns69
thanks

also sprach Jeroen Schot <sc...@a-eskwadraat.nl> [2011.03.10.1439 +0100]:
> I am pretty sure that this formating is a 'feature' of either dig or your libc
> and is NOT a bug in nsd or pdns.
> 
> AAAA resource records are transmitted over the wire as 128 bit data in network
> byte order, so it is impossible to even preserve the textual representation. 
> See
> RFC 3596 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3596).

Indeed. All the tools I used are ISC clients and the problem is
indeed reproducible — it was silly of me to not identify this as
a problem of presentation.

I am reassigning to libdns69. I trust LaMont will fix this if my
guess was wrong.

Thanks,

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"when faced with a new problem, the wise algorithmist
 will first attempt to classify it as np-complete.
 this will avoid many tears and tantrums as
 algorithm after algorithm fails."
                                                          -- g. niruta

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)

Reply via email to