On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 04:17:02PM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 08:51:16PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > >On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 03:39:27PM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >> * New upstream release > >>diff -Nru libpng-1.2.44/debian/libpng3.links > >>libpng-1.2.44/debian/libpng3.links > >>--- libpng-1.2.44/debian/libpng3.links 2006-11-19 15:31:52.000000000 > >>+1100 > >>+++ libpng-1.2.44/debian/libpng3.links 2011-03-13 14:40:24.000000000 > >>+1100 > >>@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ > >>-/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 > >>+/lib/libpng12.so.0 /lib/libpng.so.3
> >Er, what is this link for? Looks like a gratuitous change. We should only > >need the link in /usr/lib. > I don't think so. If /usr is not mounted yet, libpng.so.3 will be found > in /lib which also has libpng12.so.0. That was the argument to move > libpng12.so.0 to /lib. libpng3 is a compatibility package. There's no rational reason why this is needed at early boot. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
