"PV" == Paul Vojta writes: PV> I have looked into supporting TrueType in xdvi. A key subsidiary PV> issue that came up (and stopped it for me) was compatibility with PV> ttf2tfm and ttf2pk. They come up with their own character PV> encoding that basically (as I recall) chooses the lowest-numbered PV> 255 or 256 available characters into the encoding vector. Adding PV> to the difficulties is the fact that ttf2tfm/ttf2pk use the old PV> (version 1) freetype library. I tried porting these programs to PV> freetype2, but the latter lacks some features of the original PV> freetype, and is never likely to have them (Werner Lemberg said PV> that programs should use pango instead for these features).
above you wrote "I have looked into supporting TrueType in xdvi", which as far as i understand shall mean ability to render (using freetype library) glyphs directly from TrueType fonts, and of course also selecting the needed glyphs of the TrueType fonts according to the ReEncodeFont instructions from the MAP files. yet, later you write about ttf2tfm and ttf2pk and how they are using old freetype library etc. i do not see any relation between "support of TrueType in xdvi" and those two programs - ttf2tfm and ttf2pk. there is no relation whatsoever. ttf2tfm is one of the many ways to create TFM metrics from the TrueType fonts, and ttf2pk is, as you know, just a converter from TrueType to PK for those programs which DO NOT support TrueType, and thus need to fall back to use PK fonts. could you please explain what do you mean? Best, v. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]