On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 01:31 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > libsigsegv in unstable changes soname for the library so all depending > packages need to be rebuild. The depwait is needed as 2.9-1 misses the > actual shared library by accident (#616576) so packages build against > that version will link against the static library. That's also the > reason clisp is needed as it was build against -1
Other than the amd64 maintainer upload, clisp hasn't actually managed to build anywhere yet, so can't be binNMUed. I've added the dep-wait for it anyway, which means it will be retried once the updated libsigsegv is available. Does the amd64 package need binNMUing as well? > I did a test-rebuild of asymptote to double-check it will be working > which was successfull. > > Hope I did get the syntax right. > > nmu clisp_2.49-2 . ALL . -m "Build against newer libsigsegv" > nmu gnu-smaltalk_3.2-1 . ALL . -m "Build against newer libsigsegv" > nmu asymptote_2.02-2 . ALL . -m "Build against newer libsigsegv" > nmu scheme2c_1993.3.15.2-10 . ALL . -m "Build against newer libsigsegv" fwiw, you can do all of the above in one command: nmu clisp gnu-smalltalk asymptote scheme2c . ALL . ... gnu-smalltalk has been marked as Failed on powerpc, s390 and sparc for a few months due to #590227 (although previous versions built fine) so hasn't been binNMUed on those architectures. Is there any reason to suppose that it will now build? > dw clisp_2.49-2 . ALL . -m 'libsigsegv (>= 2.9-2~)' > dw gnu-smaltalk_3.2-1 . ALL . -m 'libsigsegv (>= 2.9-2~)' > dw asymptote_2.02-2 . ALL . -m 'libsigsegv (>= 2.9-2~)' > dw scheme2c_1993.3.15.2-10 . ALL . -m 'libsigsegv (>= 2.9-2~)' dep-waits need to be on a binary package; I chose libsigsegv2 in this case. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
