On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:30:10PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote: > found 325490 6:6.2.3.0-1 > forwarded 325490 > http://redux.imagemagick.org/discussion-server/viewtopic.php?t=4795 > thanks
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 06:45:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 03:11:43AM +0200, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: > > > $ ale ./CIMG7387.jpg ale.jpg > > > Output file will be 'ale.jpg'. > > > Reading original frame './CIMG7387.jpg' > > > ale: unable to open image `87.jpg': No such file or directory. > > > Something seems broken in the file name handling. Rebuilding from > > > source does not show the error any more. > > This points to silent ABI breakage in libmagick6 (of the sort that we've > > seen before, sigh). Reassigning to that package. Ryuichi, please see > > to it that libmagick6's package name changes, if this is indeed a broken > > ABI. > It is. Some of the incompatible changes date back to 6.0.7 and were the > reason why we stuck with 6.0.6 for sarge. As far as I remember, we've > notified upstream about the breakage back then, but despite further ABI > changes we're still with the old soname in 6.2.3. I've started another > plea for a soname bump at the URL given above. Steve, in the meantime > should we go back to the ABI in testing and file bugs on all packages > built with 6.2.3 or just wait for a soname bump from upstream, which > will require a global recompile anyway? It's been my experience with this kind of ABI breakage that the only good way out is through. If upstream has not been responsive to the need to change the soname in response to the ABI changes, then I would at least recommend changing the library package name to something like libmagick6debian1 so that this can be sorted out within the Debian package dependencies in unstable while we're waiting. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
