On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 23:38 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Self-cluestick: b2 already has a get_full_tree method which iterates > reverse-dependency lists, so we should just use that. Updated patch > coming to a b2 tree near you soon.
Actually, it looks like get_full_tree() is hugely overkill in this case. Purely building the complete list of affected packages when considering debianutils takes several minutes (I have to admit I got bored and cancelled the run after five minutes of no obvious activity) whereas with my admittedly less elegant patch the whole run takes less than that. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org