On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:37 AM, martin f krafft <madd...@debian.org> wrote: > also sprach Denis Laxalde <dlaxa...@gmail.com> [2011.03.01.1632 +0100]: >> The last version of mkd.vim handles this properly now. Also, the two >> syntax files can probably co-exist since they have different names (mkd, >> markdown). > > But such redundancy isn't desirable, now is it?
Especially given that the officially sanctioned filetype name is markdown, not mkd as used by this script. By using mkd as the filetype, you now lose any benefit of the other official scripts since you're not using the same filetype name. This is one of the reasons I try to push people to maintain their scripts within Vim upstream. In an ideal world, the vim-scripts package wouldn't exist. Is there anything this syntax script supports that the official one doesn't? If so, it probably makes better sense to try and merge that functionality into the official script. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <james...@debian.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
