On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > Have you actually read what I wrote in > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612710#29
Yes I have. I don't know which part of the comment you suppose I have not read carefully enough but I guess it's the one about splitting the package. But if you have read my comment you would have known that I propose splitting the package in a different way than the one you have mentioned. Of course splitting it into pm-utils and pm-utils-modules would require to have both packages installed to have basic functionality. What I propose is splitting just the "power.d/*" part, so that after splitting the package this way "pm-utils" would still retain 99% of the functionality that "pm-utils" have currently (at 1.3.0-3) and if one would want to have an extra of runtime power management that person would have to install additional package. Without that package installed pm-utils would still provide almost all of the functionality it provided at 1.3.0-6. You have also stated that you have contacted Martin regarding the patch and although there is no file conflict right now there is still a problem that the functionality overlaps. I also think that there is a problem with it overlapping but proposed way of split would allow 99% of the former functionality of pm-utils to coexist with laptop-mode-tools and people would have a choice of the package they would use to control runtime power saving. But... as I have also stated above what seems to be the best solution to me does not have to actually be the best solution and I will not stick to my idea stubbornly. :) -- Best regards, Piotr Szczepanik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
