UFRaw 0.18 was released upstream earlier this week[1]. I've become interested in this issue because gimp-ufraw is nearly useless for my Canon PowerShot S95, for which support is added in the 0.18 release (via dcraw.c revision 1.440 [2]).
Is there still potential for progress on this bug to upgrade to the latest upstream version, or should I open a new bug to update to version 0.18, or a new bug to specifically address the S95 incompatibility with the version in Debian (with the tag fixed-upstream)? If this bug is sufficient to address my issue as well, I request that it be upgraded to severity: important, because it produces badly flawed output for some users in its current state. Thanks, -David R. Hedges da...@thelittleman.net [1] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=27092156 [2] http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/RCS/dcraw.c,v -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
