On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:41, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 21:43 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> Personally (and several other people) I think that having explicitly >> written "no deps here" is much better than nothing.. at least in my >> experience this way I found several reports where deps information >> were removed due to "privacy issues". > > Would you consider adding this if it required a configuration option to > turn it on?
Mh honestly I don't feel it's worth it :) Probably I'm not completely getting your reason behind this request: does those few lines bother you so much? or it's just a way to reduce (nearly empty) information in reports? I like more consistency than minimalism :) Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
