[Chris Hiestand]
> Maybe I'm wrong and just misunderstanding how warning should be
> displayed? If so, is there another way to reword and make it more
> clear?

I believe you misunderstand what is going on here.  The arguments you
give to update-rc.d are inconsistent with the LSB header, and that is
what the warning is about.  The 'defaults' argument is the same as
"start 2 3 4 5 . stop 0 1 6 .", and this do not match the LSB header
which is the equvalent of "start 4 5 . stop 2 3 .".

Any proposal on how to make the warning more clear?

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to