Package: serna-free Severity: normal ref: http://fossdocs.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/syntext-serna-4-2-and-dita-support/
Oh, one more thing while I’m at it: There seems to be a problem with the DITA 1.1 templates included with Syntext Serna 4.2 (the Open Source version, of course). The xml generated by the template contains both xsd and dtd declarations. For example: <!DOCTYPE concept PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DITA Concept//EN" "concept.dtd" []> <concept xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" id="concept-1" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="urnasis:names:tc: dita:xsd:concept.xsd:1.1"> You can see there a Doctype declaration, which invokes the DTD for validation, followed by an xsd declaration as an xmlns attribute of the concept element. The problem with this is that either xsd or dtd should be used as the xml schema, not both. If both are present Xerces will attempt to do both types of validation. When it does DTD validation it will fail, because an xsd declaration is not part of the DTD. Putting both types of validation into the template looks like a bug. If you create a new DITA 1.1 Concept from the template, and then Publish > HTML, it produces the error: [pipeline] Using XERCES. [pipeline] [Error] :4:155: Attribute "xmlns:xsi" must be declared for element type "concept". [pipeline] [Error] :4:155: Attribute "xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation" must be declared for element type "concept". My workaround has been to edit the template files in plugins/dita/oasis-dita--11.sdt and remove the xsd declaration. DITA topics created with the templates then validate fine using DTD validation. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers squeeze-updates APT policy: (500, 'squeeze-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org