The Conflict was introduced by pm-utils. We Recommend them because we install a hook into pm-utils to be invoked during resume. With LMT 1.56 (that has been recently released), we enhanced our invoke model. So we no more are relying on them for invocation on resume. When I package 1.56, pm-utils will be demoted to Suggests.
But to use LMT, you'd still have to (because of the Conflict introduced by pm-utils) use either one of it. Ritesh On 02/19/2011 08:05 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > Laptop-mode-tools recommends pm-utils but pm-utils 1.4.1 conflicts with it. > > pm-utils changelog.Debian reads: > > * debian/control: Conflicts/Replaces: laptop-mode-tools, as both ship > /usr/lib/pm-utils/power.d/laptop-mode and the changelog below indicates > these two packages should not be used together anyway. (LP: #606160) > > I guess the author means the following when talking about "should not be > used together" : > > pm-utils (1.4.1-1) experimental; urgency=low > > * New upstream release. (Closes: #588587) > The main improvement is that this ships some generally useful power > management hooks by default. Note that this conflicts with similar > packages such as laptop-mode-tools or pm-utils-powersave-policy, so you > should not enable them and pm-utils at the same time. > > Relevant report for pm-utils: #612710 -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
