You might be interested in hearing that I have a new
patch in testing, a patch that does support IPv6.
There are two features you might care comment on:
The mode "-D base_name" is present in today's Strobe,
it is only not mentioned in the manual page.
1. a new subdirectory "$base_name/networks/ipv6/", thus
positioning the parsed IPv6 addresses one level lower
than IPv4 addresses.
the "implied naughts", i.e., "::", are translated as "_".
As an example, localhost would go into
$base_name/networks/ipv6/_/1/::1-localhost/
Of a different kind is this:
2. The support of IPv4 and IPv6 implies that a single
symbolic host name can be resolve into two ore more
addresses. Should both be entered into the host list?
In case of an affirmative answer, the program flow
needs a more substantial change then the implementation
of IPv6 transports, which I already has got running.
Best regards,
Mats Erik Andersson, DM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
