Marc Lehmann, le Thu 10 Feb 2011 00:45:04 +0100, a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:24:56AM +0100, Samuel Thibault > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > (*) debian has a long tradition of non-communication with upstream and > > > > > deliberate bug-introducing patches, > > > > > > > > Please don't FUD. > > > > > > And how would you know? > > > > Because that's written in the Debian policy: > > Yeah, did you read it? It says you don't need to, you should. > > Contrast this with e.g. fedora's upstream policy, which makes NOT sending > upstream patches an exceptional case, and even discourages patches that > deviate from upstream altogether, except in grave cases (such as grave > security problems). > > If you wanted to show that debian clearly doesn't care much, you > succeeded.
Ok, then propose to change that point of the Debian policy, I fully agree that it should be a strong requirement. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
