David Prévot, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 23:50:26 -0400, a écrit : > Le 05/02/2011 22:39, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > > Simon Paillard, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 03:30:48 +0100, a écrit : > >> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:25:10AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >>> Wolodja Wentland, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 01:46:09 +0000, a écrit : > >>>> http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386/ is missing and results in a > >>>> 404. > >>> > >>> Yes, that's expected, it's http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/ for > >>> both. > >>> Where did you see that bogus URL? > >> > >> http://debian.org/releases/squeeze/ > >> We link according to the arch name. > > > > Ok, that's actually collusion. In the debian manual, we separate arch > > name from port website name. > > Hi kFreeBSD team, > > We are wondering if the kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 would deserve > their own http://www.debian.org/ports/ pages. It may be the more > consistent approach regarding existing directory name (alpha, amd64, > arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, powerpc, s390, sparc, sparc64, etc.) > but this choice is up to you. > > If there is no point in maintaining both the ports/kfreebsd-amd64 and > ports/kfreebsd-i386 pages, we could try to tweak the auto-generated > links about kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 to actually point to > ports/kfreebsd-gnu, but since those links maybe automatically generated > in other documents like release-notes or installation-guide, we may also > need to prepare a 301 redirection from ports/kfreebsd-amd64 and > kfreebsd-i386.
The installation guide already correctly generates the links. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
