Hi, I was also just testing it, all combinations I tried didn't work with the built package you provided. Miguel do you want access into my server, just so you can verify ? I should also note my server is a xen domu, but that should make absolutely no difference.
I will also try compiling it / building my own package and will let you know if that works for me also. All the best, Vamegh On 4 February 2011 22:49, Nelson Lago <nelson.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Miguel Landaeta <mig...@miguel.cc> wrote: >> I prepared a new package for 1.2.31. >> Would you please test it? > > Your binary package itself did not work, BUT I took your sources and > created a debian package myself, and it works! > > I downloaded the files: > > libapache-mod-jk_1.2.31-0miguel1.dsc > libapache-mod-jk_1.2.31-0miguel1.debian.tar.gz > libapache-mod-jk_1.2.31.orig.tar.gz > > Then > > dpkg-source -x libapache-mod-jk_1.2.31-0miguel1.dsc > > then debian/rules binary > > I really do not understand why this happens, though. If the only > important difference here was the OpenVZ kernel, how would this > influence the compilation? > > If you also do not know what is going on, maybe this should be brought > to the attention of the mainstream authors. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
