On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Wookey <woo...@wookware.org> wrote: > > Line 22 of that file is TCL_CC='x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc' on the x86_64 > version and TCL_CC='arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc' on the armel version. > Also the TCL_DEFS= varies with arch, e.g 64-bit arches have different > defines from 32-bit arches. > So in fact it's not an arch-independent file, and shouldn't be in > /usr/share.
I missed the fact that these scripts are actually arch-dependent. They should go into /usr/lib/tcltk/tcl8.5 indeed. Thanks for the finding. > > I notice that upstream tcl builds these files in /lib but then we move > them into /usr/share and then put a link back in the old place. Is > there a good reason for this, or should we just leave them in /lib in > the first place? Yes, though not in /usr/lib itself but in /usr/lib/tcl8.5 because there are other Tcl/Tk versions around, and symlink /usr/lib/tclConfig.sh is managed by tcl-dev package (points to the default version). Cheers! -- Sergei Golovan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
