Package: apt Version: 0.8.10 Severity: minor apt-mark requires python-apt to run. But python-apt is only suggested. I think apt should depend on python-apt because I don't see the point in including a non-working tool in a package.
If a working apt-mark is only suggested, then, maybe apt-mark should belong to another package that apt would suggest. Regards, Celelibi -- Package-specific info: -- (/etc/apt/preferences present, but not submitted) -- -- (/etc/apt/sources.list present, but not submitted) -- -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (995, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages apt depends on: ii debian-archive-keyring 2010.08.28 GnuPG archive keys of the Debian a ii gnupg 1.4.10-4 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep ii libc6 2.11.2-9 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.4.5-8 GCC support library ii libstdc++6 4.4.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime apt recommends no packages. Versions of packages apt suggests: pn apt-doc <none> (no description available) pn aptitude | synaptic | wajig <none> (no description available) ii bzip2 1.0.5-6 high-quality block-sorting file co ii dpkg-dev 1.15.8.8 Debian package development tools ii lzma 4.43-14 Compression method of 7z format in ii python-apt 0.7.100.1 Python interface to libapt-pkg -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org