On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 19:19 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > I take it that dpkg will be changed someday so that an unmodified > conffile will have its perms updated? > Yeah, that should be supported I think. Don't know whether it'll get fixed in 1.13, but 2.0 would inherently fix it I think.
Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
