On 01/20/2011 03:58 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > > Please unblock package debiandoc-sgml >
So, the change is as follows (after re-ordering, so that the diff shows some sense): -Recommends: ghostscript | gs, texlive-latex-extra, texinfo, libpaperg, texlive-latex-recommended, texlive-latex-base, texlive-fonts-recommended +Recommends: ghostscript | gs-esp | gs, texlive-latex-extra, texinfo, texlive -Suggests: debiandoc-sgml-doc, latex-cjk-all, hlatex, littex +Suggests: debiandoc-sgml-doc, texlive-lang-all, latex-cjk-all Why gs-esp got added in the Recommends? Why texlive got added? Adding it brings back texlive-fonts-recommended, texlive-latex-recommended and texlive-latex-base. I thought that those were removed because too heavy for lambda users. The changes seem like a no-op to me… I could be wrong though but will need an explanation. (The version thing in the changelog is also odd… but Meh) Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
