Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org): > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:36:31 -0700, LaMont Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:48:28AM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > Hmm, LaMont, would it be possible for you to reupload with fixed PO > > > > files (I think you just need to dig them out from the BTS....they have > > > > probably been broken by the infamous mutt encoding bug)? This, > > > > assuming the release team is OK with that, of course. > > > > Let me go digging. how can I tell the good from the bad? > > > The good has utf-8 characters. The bad has question marks instead. > If you're using mutt 1.5.20-9, you need to edit the attachment's > content-type to have charset=utf-8 before saving it. Or upgrade to > 1.5.20-9+squeeze1 (or 1.5.21-2) which has the fix.
Or grab the PO file from the BTS web interface....
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
