Hi,
> This is excessive. debiandoc-sgml is installed on my system for occasional
> processing of a handful of English-language docs; I don't need 296MB of
> latex l10n support on this system, and I don't think they should be pulled
> in by default. Please demote texlive-lang-all and latex-cjk-all to Suggests
> instead of Recommends.
I agree with you.
Question 1:
I have this situation now.
versions
old 1.1.101
stable 1.2.9
testing 1.2.15
unstable 1.2.16 (Not meant for squeeze)
exp 1.2.19
What version number should I use?
1.2.20 targetted to unstable with minimal diff with 1.2.15
1.2.16+squeeze targetted to unstable with minimal diff with 1.2.15
I can update to 1.2.21 for experimental.
Question 2:
What should be the diff?
demote texlive-lang-all and latex-cjk-all to Suggests
remove non-existing hlatex litex from control
If I do what you suggest, can this be accepted for unblock at this stage?
If I do the second one, can this be accepted for unblock at this stage?
If so, I will fix this this week end.
Osamu
> Versions of packages debiandoc-sgml suggests:
> pn debiandoc-sgml-doc <none> (no description available)
> pn hlatex <none> (no description available)
> pn latex-cjk-all <none> (no description available)
> pn littex <none> (no description available)
>
> -- no debconf information
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
