On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:06:46 -0500 Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:03:13 +0100 Florian Weimer wrote: > > > * Thijs Kinkhorst: > > > > > Currently, issues marked as unimportant disappear entirely off the > > > radar, which is not a big problem. I think for clarity however it > > > would be better if they were displayed somewhere so users can see we > > > know that such a CVE applies to the package, but we just disregard it. > > > > <undetermined> probably has got a similar problem. I agree that this > > issue should be addressed. > > I implemented this a while back. See links 'show unimportant issues' > and 'show issues that may be vulnerable but need to be > checked' (i.e. <undetermined> issues) at for example: > http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/unstable
Just realized that this wish is meant for the per-package pages. That isn't done yet. I may look into it if I find some free time. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
