Hey again, On 03/01/2011 Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2011-01-03 Jonas Meurer <jo...@freesources.org> wrote: > > On 01/01/2011 Andreas Metzler wrote: > [...] > > > Uploaded with minor changes. I fear the package will need to go > > > throug NEW tough, due to the added component (udeb). > > > Thanks for the quick response. But I fear that a binNMU will be required > > once both libgcrypt11 1.4.6-2 and libgpg-error 1.10-0.2 entered debian > > experimental. > > I cannot prove this right now, as the libgcrypt11-udeb package is not > > available yet, but from what I know since yesterday, libgcrypt11-udeb > > might depend on libgpg-error0 instead of libgpg-error0-udeb, > > Hello, > It does. I saw this just before uploading but uploaded anyway to get > into NEW. I intend to version the build-depends accordingly, once the > new gpg-error is accepted.
now that both libgcrypt11-udeb and libgpg-error0-udeb passed the NEW queue, you could consider to re-upload libgcrypt11. I'm not sure whether versioned build-depends help about that, though. The versioned build-depends don't verify that the udeb is available, after all. I thought about versioning the build-depends on libgcrypt11-dev accordingly as well, but that could perfectly well be achieved by installing the right version of that exact package (libcrypt11-dev) locally, without having any repositories configured that hold libgcrypt11-udeb. i'd be interested in your opinion here. still unsure what to do about it. greetings, jonas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
