I've actually already built a working package for Gnote 0.7.3; I'm currently hosting my debian/ directory, as well as a binary deb package (which installs and works fine, and is lintian clean) on Github: https://github.com/Vincent-C/gnote
<https://github.com/Vincent-C/gnote>If you'd like to use what I have already, please feel free to do so, but keep in mind that I had originally packaged Gnote with a QA upload in mind, so you're going to have to edit debian/control and debian/changelog if you plan on adopting Gnote. Also, Simon, to be honest I have no clue how to port Gnote to a different Dbus implementation...I'm actually still learning the basics of Debian packaging at the moment, so that's a bit out of my league at the moment. I'm also unable to find the current upstream location of dbus-c++; dbus-cpp seems to be deprecated in favour of dbus-c++, and I'm having trouble getting dbus-cxx to build itself anyways, so I guess the only option left for me to choose from is to disable dbus support for Gnote altogether. Would that have an adverse effect on Gnote's functionality? (If Mr. Filoni can port Gnote to a different dbus implementation, then that would be awesome.) - Vincent Cheng On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Devid Antonio Filoni <devid...@gmail.com>wrote: > I'll work on this tomorrow, I'm sorry, my PC was broked and I didn't > have time at all. > > Devid Antonio Filoni > > On 1/6/11, Vincent Cheng <vincentc1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Mr. Filoni, are you still interested in adopting Gnote in Debian, as per > > your ITA bug report? I'm interested in doing a QA upload to update Gnote > to > > the latest upstream version, and in addition, if you no longer intend to > > adopt this package, I would be willing to adopt and maintain it myself. > > Thanks! > > > > - Vincent Cheng <vincentc1...@gmail.com> > > >
