On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 01:12:42PM -0600, you wrote:
On Sunday 02 January 2011 10:09:34 Michael Stone wrote:
That's not what -h does on the other commands; in those cases they use
lchown to change the ownership of the symlink itself--and there's no
corresponding lchmod.
Yes, that's exactly the reason why I implemented it that way. FreeBSD is the
only OS that I know that provides lchmod(2)
So you end up with a command that is inconsistent with -h on the other
commands. This doesn't seem like a feature.
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
