On 0, Jakob Haufe <su...@sur5r.net> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:04:13 +0000 > "Adam D. Barratt" <a...@funky-badger.org> wrote: > > > As a side-effect, it will not be possible to include packages which are > > not part of the corresponding stable release. If we remove minitube > > from Squeeze now, further updates once Squeeze is stable would then need > > to be made via backports, rather than volatile. > > > > I have no particular preference which route is taken, but thought it was > > worth spelling out the consequences. > > I would either like to see a freeze exception for 1.3 or, if that's not > possible, a removal of 1.1. Releasing Squeeze with 1.1 makes no sense for me. > > But it's up to the release team to decide on this. >
I've added a removal hint for it. Even if we have -updates available, I'm not sure that it should be used for such software. Changes that have been applied between 1.1 and 1.3 are not negligible. It could be tricky to accept such update during stable's lifetime. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
