tags 322143 patch
thanks

Hi John,

gcj-3.3 has indeed already been removed from unstable, which means that
classpath now fails to build from source in unstable.  Attached is a
patch with Doko's proposed fix, to build-depend on gcj on arm instead of
specifying gcj-3.3.  Since debussy.debian.org is still down, I'm afraid
I have to take it on faith that the newer versions of gcj will
successfully build classpath; nevertheless, I have uploaded this as an
NMU to the DELAYED/2-day queue on gluck to try to get this bug fixed.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/
diff -u classpath-0.14/debian/control classpath-0.14/debian/control
--- classpath-0.14/debian/control
+++ classpath-0.14/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: libs
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), jikes (>= 1.19) [!arm], gcj-3.3 [arm], 
zip, libgtk2.0-dev, libart-2.0-dev, libx11-dev, libice-dev, libxt-dev, 
libxtst-dev, cdbs
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), jikes (>= 1.19) [!arm], gcj [arm], zip, 
libgtk2.0-dev, libart-2.0-dev, libx11-dev, libice-dev, libxt-dev, libxtst-dev, 
cdbs
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 Uploaders: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 
diff -u classpath-0.14/debian/changelog classpath-0.14/debian/changelog
--- classpath-0.14/debian/changelog
+++ classpath-0.14/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+classpath (2:0.14-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Medium-urgency upload for RC bugfix.
+  * Build-depend on gcj on arm, instead of the now-removed gcj-3.3
+    (closes: #322143).
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:17:50 -0700
+
 classpath (2:0.14-2) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Removed build-dependency on gjdoc as gjdoc is not currently used during

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to