Hi Bill, I've taken an interest in libjpeg-turbo and would like to help out with this. Not sure if anything has happened in the last few weeks, or if you've been concentrating on squeeze. The version of libjpeg.so in libjpeg-turbo 1.0.1 looks fine to me -- it has an identical SONAME as the one provided in libjpeg62, and appears to be ABI compatible. It also provides a libturbojpeg.so, which is isn't versioned properly, is this what you're referring to? In any case, the libjpeg.so could co-exist in the repositories with libjpeg62 by using /etc/alternatives, yes?
Regards, Albert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
