Hello Simon, On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 11:43:28PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:42:33PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > clone 579575 -1 > > reassign -1 release-notes > > thanks > > > > Given that traditionally a returned unmount would indicate that all > > outstanding write operations are completed and it was hence safe to > > remove the media and the ubiquity of fat formatted usb drives and the > > fact that non command line users are affacted too this behaviour > > clearly should be mentioned in the release notes. > > Actually this bug has not been confirmed by util-linux maintainers, and is not > reproducible (linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 2.6.32-28 with util-linux > 2.17.2-3.3).
Glad to hear that!
I assumed that the "no confirmation" was a "I have not idea how to fix
this", this assumption has now been corrected, thanks.
> It seems misunderstanding happened between reporters and Moritz (on whether
> they actually umounted it or not).
Rereading the bug trail I see your point. Unfortunately Moritz did not
reply to #22 and so I understood it was a silent agreement.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
