[ please do _not_ drop peoples of the cc list. i agree [EMAIL PROTECTED] was mistakenly on that list. ]
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 04:02:51PM -0400, A. Costa wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:36:24 +0200 > maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > an expired tag that would close bugs one month later after tagging if the > > bug reporter doesn't reappear would be on my highest wishlist now the bts > > gets even nicer. > > But suppose the maintainer is away for a while? Reporter X sends in > a report, Maintainer Y doesn't even reply for 6 months. So the BTS > closes it, so Y never sees it. > > Or suppose the _reporter_ was away for a while, or dies? X writes a > good report, a week later is eaten by sharks, two weeks after Y > replies, gets no reply for two weeks then closes it. already done quite a lot of bug sorting. a list of open bugs tagged wontfix is not a happy place. nor a list of bugs tagged moreinfo without any substantial feedback by its submitters. for the second ones such a slow die mode would be perfect. anyway this is not the place to discuss that. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
