On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 05:52:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Thinking about this issue, I agree with Ted's opinion - we don't
> probably need to consider about cross-release. However, actually this
> problem was caused by glibc, and such change made old e2fsprogs
> unusable. It's a bit hard to decide, but in this case I choose to add
> "Conflicts: e2fsprogs (<= 1.37-2sarge1)". Ted, is this version <=
> 1.37-2sarge1 correct value?
Actually, to be completely correct, the right value should be
"Conflicts: e2fsprogs (< 1.35-7)", as linux-gate.so started being
filtered in e2fsprogs 1.35-7.
(I wrote 1.37-5 in a previous message, but that was a typo; my
apologies for any confusion that may have engendered.)
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
