On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 08:52 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 00:12 +0000, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > What about "numa=fake=1"? I think that should force it to create a
> > single NUMA node.
>
> Is there any advantage to this vs numa=noacpi? Do they effectively end
> up doing the same thing?
The help text for CONFIG_NUMA_EMU (which enables numa=fake=N) says:
Enable NUMA emulation. A flat machine will be split
into virtual nodes when booted with "numa=fake=N", where N is
the
number of nodes. This is only useful for debugging.
I don't think this is the option we want.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
